Business News

Sequoia’s Sean Maguire Compares SpaceX to Nvidia ‘Three Years Ago’ and Plans to Hold on Forever

Quick Learning

  • NVDA increased 420% from the inflection Maguire maps SpaceX to; RKLB, a close representative of the public launch, has already increased by 320 percent in the past year.

  • Maguire’s ‘hold on forever’ stance is based on a 2029 to 2030 revenue model, but he’s holding on to Sequoia’s costs while public investors are not.

  • Don’t wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list for FREE now.

Sequoia Capital partner Shaun Maguire went on CNBC last week and said SpaceX (NASDAQ:SPCX), new trading, looks to him “like Nvidia three years ago” rather Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA). He also said he plans to hold his shares “forever.” Sequoia is a long-time supporter of SpaceX, so the motivation to talk about his book is obvious. Still, the comparison should be relaxed because it’s a specific claim about where SpaceX sits on the curve, and the curve has a more recent, more expensive predecessor.

ImageFlow / Shutterstock.com

Comparison of NVIDIA, and why it rejected Tesla’s

Three years ago, in June 2023, NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) can be sold at $39.41. The AI ​​thesis was challenged, hyperscaler capex was just starting to decline, and the bears put the stock as a chip name that is going through a temporary GPU shortage. Since then, NVIDIA shares have risen 419.89%, the company has a market cap of $4.95 trillion, and data center revenue for Q1 FY27 alone reached $75.25 billion, up 92% year-on-year. CEO Jensen Huang called the building “the largest infrastructure expansion in human history.” You can read more about the 8-K here.

Maguire’s framework implies that SpaceX is in a similar position. Real customers, the infrastructure thesis is concrete, and the iterations haven’t put a price on what they think 2029 and 2030 revenues will look like. Tesla is rejected because he often traded on narrative rather than physical contract income. SpaceX’s Connectivity segment generated $11.39 billion in 2025, with an adjusted EBITDA segment of $7.17 billion, growing 49.8% year over year. That’s the part of the business that already pays for the hard parts.

Three-year growth spurts Maguire writes

He expects “tremendous growth” in the next three years from three vectors. Starship, orbital data centers, and direct-to-cell Starlink. SpaceX says the Starship V3 must carry 100 metric tons to orbit, and the vehicle could reduce the cost of getting into orbit by 99% or more. It lowers startup costs by two orders of magnitude and the market order itself is adjustable.

Orbital data center pitch Wilder. SpaceX expects to begin operating AI computer satellites in orbit as early as 2028, eventually forming a constellation of potentially millions of satellites operating in direct orbit around the sun. The acquisition of xAI closed in February 2026 and now forms part of AI, which brought in $818 million in revenue in the first quarter alone while burning operating capital in computer architecture.

Don’t wait: an analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 recently revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list for FREE now.

The “hold forever” model and what’s behind it

Maguire said the silent part out loud. “I have what I think the company’s revenue will be in 2029, 2030. And I have what I think is a reasonable multiple on that. The answer I’m getting is a very large number.” He also called the SpaceX mission “the most important mission of any company in history.” That second part is the venture-capital register. The first part is DCF dressed up in guilty language.

Early proponents have a clear reason for speaking early. Newly public stocks tend to decline around the close of the closing period as insiders sell. None of this invalidates the long thesis, but it does shape how a public market investor should approach any position.

Key person risk and social market solutions

On Elon, Maguire said “Elon is the most visionary businessman of all. I also think he is underappreciated for his ability to work.”. SpaceX’s S-1 is vague, describing the company as “highly dependent” on Musk and noting that it does not maintain life insurance on someone important to him. He also runs Tesla, has held roles at Neuralink and The Boring Company, and previously served as Senior Advisor to the President.

For exposure to the same ecosystem, Tesla owns a $2 billion stake in SpaceX and shares Musk’s attention. Shares are down 7.2% year to date at $406, although Polymarket assigns a 90.5% chance that SpaceX will carry the higher price between the two on June 30.

The closest comparable launch is Rocket Lab (NASDAQ:RKLB), is up 34% year to date and 285% over the past year. Q1 revenue grew 63.5% to $200.35 million, backlog reached $2.2 billion, and the company was selected for the Department of War’s Space Based Interceptor program. The Neutron, a medium-lift rocket intended to match the Falcon 9, was delayed in 2026 after a stage-1 tank test failed. The valuation, at 102.6 times following the sale, is already the price of many things that have not happened yet. Which, surprisingly, is also Maguire’s argument for SpaceX. The difference is that he gets to hold his shares forever based on the cost that Sequoia paid over the years, and you don’t.

Don’t wait: an analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 recently revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list for FREE now.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button