I Asked ChatGPT How Much The Top 1% Will Pay If They Are Taxed At The Same Effective Rate And Less Than 75%

The question sounds simple enough: What would happen if the wealthiest Americans paid the same amount in taxes as everyone else? But when you actually run the numbers, the answer quickly becomes difficult.

Read More: I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid The Same Rate In Taxes As The Average Citizen Of Hawaii

Read Next: 5 Cheap Ways to Make Extra Money (You Can Start This Week)

I asked ChatGPT to break down what would happen if the top 1% of taxpayers paid the same effective tax rate as the bottom 75% of Americans. The results were not what most people would have expected.

Here is where things stand now. The top 1% of taxpayers pay about 26% of their income in federal income taxes. That’s their effective rate after all deductions and credits are accounted for.

The lowest 75% pay between 10% and 15% depending on where they fall in that range. The bottom half of earners pay less, around 3% to 4%.

In 2022, the top 1% gave the IRS about $860 billion, which was about 40% of all income tax revenue collected that year.

Find out: 5 Ways You Can Cut Your Tax Bill Like a Millionaire, According to Robert Kiyosaki

This is where it gets interesting. If you made the top 1% pay the same effective amount as the bottom 75%, you would be lowering their taxes, not raising them.

Think about that for a second. Discussion of tax inequity often assumes that the rich get something. But on income tax rates, they already pay a higher percentage than most Americans.

If you dropped the top 1% down to 15% or 18% of the effective rate to match the bottom 75%, corporate tax revenue would drop significantly. That’s the opposite of what people mean when they talk about making the rich “pay their fair share.”

The frustration that many people feel is not necessarily income tax rates. It is about how different types of money are taxed differently.

Rich people make most of their money from investments, not from paychecks. Investment income is taxed at lower rates than wages. This is where the termination occurs. An employee pays more out of his salary than an investor pays out of his stock profits.

If you close those loopholes and make investment income subject to the same tax treatment as regular wages, that’s when you’ll see a big increase in income. ChatGPT explained that economists estimate that this approach could bring anywhere from hundreds of billions to more than $1 trillion annually.

But that situation requires changing the way we tax wealth, not just fixing rates.

There is no official government estimate of what will happen in these situations. The IRS provides data on what’s current, but ongoing changes get worse quickly.

People change their behavior when tax rates change. They get new deductions, transfer money or create deals in a different way. Some wealthy taxpayers are likely to shift their income to avoid higher rates. Some may leave certain investments altogether.

Economists disagree widely about how much taxable income would decrease if prices rise. Those ideas make a big difference in revenue projections.

The main takeaway is that tax fairness is more complex than one percent. The top 1% already pay a higher effective tax rate than the majority of Americans. Matching them down can cost the government money.

The real problem is not the prices themselves. It’s a structure. Investment income is subject to different rules than wages. Cash benefits get special treatment. Property taxes are very liberal. The wealthy have access to deductions and strategies that the average worker does not have.

When people say “tax the rich,” they usually mean closing those gaps, not literally comparing percentages to low-income earners. The conversation doesn’t always use those exact words.

ChatGPT laid out the math and it’s crystal clear: If you want the rich to donate more, you can’t just adjust their rate to match other people’s. You must change what is taxed and how it is taxed. That’s a much bigger increase than just changing the percentage.

More from GoBankingRates

This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: I Asked ChatGPT How Much The Top 1% Will Pay If They Are Charged As Low As 75%